🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are investing enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – creating their own AI models. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are racing to develop AI that understands native tongues and cultural nuances.

The International AI Arms Race

This movement is part of a larger international race dominated by tech giants from the United States and China. Whereas companies like OpenAI and a social media giant pour substantial capital, mid-sized nations are likewise placing independent bets in the AI field.

But given such vast amounts in play, is it possible for developing countries attain meaningful gains? As noted by a specialist from a prominent research institute, If not you’re a affluent nation or a major company, it’s a significant challenge to build an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Concerns

Many countries are reluctant to depend on foreign AI technologies. In India, as an example, American-made AI tools have occasionally proven inadequate. A particular instance featured an AI tool employed to teach students in a remote area – it spoke in English with a thick US accent that was difficult to follow for regional users.

Then there’s the national security dimension. For India’s military authorities, employing specific international models is seen as not permissible. As one entrepreneur explained, There might be some unvetted training dataset that might say that, oh, Ladakh is not part of India … Using that specific model in a security environment is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with people who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they don’t even want to rely on American systems because information may be transferred abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, some countries are backing local projects. One such a project is being developed in India, where an organization is attempting to develop a domestic LLM with government backing. This project has committed roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The developer foresees a AI that is less resource-intensive than leading models from American and Asian corporations. He states that the nation will have to offset the funding gap with skill. Located in India, we do not possess the luxury of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie against for example the hundreds of billions that the America is devoting? I think that is the point at which the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Regional Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is backing AI systems trained in south-east Asia’s regional languages. Such languages – for example Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often underrepresented in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the experts who are building these national AI systems were informed of how rapidly and just how fast the frontier is moving.

A senior director engaged in the initiative explains that these tools are intended to enhance more extensive systems, rather than replacing them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, often struggle with regional languages and local customs – speaking in stilted Khmer, as an example, or suggesting pork-based meals to Malay consumers.

Building local-language LLMs permits national authorities to incorporate local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful tool created elsewhere.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the word sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be better represented and we want to comprehend the capabilities” of AI systems.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding countries trying to find their place in an growing international arena, there’s another possibility: collaborate. Researchers associated with a well-known institution put forward a public AI company allocated across a alliance of emerging nations.

They term the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s successful strategy to create a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. This idea would see the formation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of different nations’ AI programs – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern giants.

The lead author of a report outlining the concept notes that the concept has gained the interest of AI ministers of at least several states to date, as well as a number of state AI organizations. While it is presently focused on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also indicated willingness.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s diminished faith in the promises of the present US administration. Experts are questioning like, is it safe to rely on these technologies? Suppose they opt to